The Impact Edit: Davos 2026: What the "World's Most Powerful Summit" Actually Said About Buildings (And What It Didn't)
The 56th World Economic Forum wrapped last month under the theme A Spirit of Dialogue, organized around five global challenges: cooperation in a contested world, unlocking new sources of growth, investing in people, deploying innovation responsibly, and building prosperity within planetary boundaries.
If you work at the intersection of built environment and social sustainability, the headlines from Davos aren't the point. What matters is reading the signals: where momentum is actually building, where it's theater, and where the gaps no one's naming are getting wider.
I've filtered the most relevant conversations through Liveable's Framework: People, Place, Product, Partners, and Philanthropy, to translate what happened on the mountain into what it actually means for practice.
TL;DR: Davos 2026 signals that social sustainability is shifting from nice-to-have to business necessity. Through Liveable's framework:
People:workforce wellbeing is now a governance issue, not an HR perk (companies seeing 300% ROI on health investments).
Place: buildings still aren't in the room despite being 38% of emissions; "brown discount" is replacing "green premium."
Product: ESG backlash isn't retreat, it's a reset toward materiality; the "S" is finally getting scrutiny.
Partners: supply chain due diligence is now operational, not aspirational; human rights requirements have teeth.
Philanthropy:moving from charitable giving to systems-level investment tied to core business.
People: Wellbeing Just Became a Governance Issue
"Investing in people" dominated Davos this year in ways that should matter to anyone responsible for workplace strategy, talent retention, or building performance.
The Future of Jobs data is by now familiar: one in four jobs is likely to change by 2030 and 39% of current skills will become obsolete. But the more interesting reframing that surfaced repeatedly was this: the biggest challenge organizations face today is not a skills gap or an AI gap- it is a work design gap.
That distinction matters. If work itself is being redesigned continuously, then the physical environments that support it cannot remain static containers optimized for yesterday's assumptions. They need to function as adaptive infrastructure.
The business case is becoming harder to ignore. At a UNFPA side event, companies reported returns of up to 300% by providing high-quality menstrual products and health education, which significantly reduced absenteeism and improved the daily comfort and performance of their female workforce. The Coalition for Reproductive Justice in Business has now grown to 27 companies engaging nearly 800,000 employees directly, with corporations such as Bayer, Essity and Nestlé mitigating the estimated US $150 billion in annual global productivity losses associated with menopause symptoms by implementing flexible work arrangements, cooling infrastructure, and manager training.
A Mercer study found 46% of employees would give up a 10% pay increase for more well-being benefits. That is not a soft preference. It's a revealed priority that shows up directly in retention and engagement data.
The decision point: If wellbeing still sits in your organization as an HR benefit rather than an operating model question, you are almost certainly underinvesting. At Davos, workforce health was framed as strategic infrastructure, not amenity programming.
Place: The "Brown Discount" has arrived
Real estate continues to occupy a strange position in sustainability conversations. It is widely acknowledged as responsible for 38% of all global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, yet it is often treated as background rather than driver when social sustainability is discussed.
The numbers are sobering. According to Savills research, in the office sector alone, less than a quarter of the stock has a green certification (BREEAM, LEED or WELL), across 20 key global cities, and more than 70% of office stock was built before 2010. JLL's analysis found that retrofit rates remain stuck at around 1%, meaning that rate needs to at least triple to align with net-zero pathways.
What is shifting is the value logic. The conversation has moved from "green premium" to "brown discount." The focus is shifting from being in a prime location with sweeping views from the top floors, to championing net-zero carbon, promoting health and wellbeing, and being resilient to climate change. World Economic Forum Buildings that fail to perform will lose relevance, not just upside.
The WEF's focus on the "brain economy" reinforced this. Investment in "brain capital" (brain health and brain skills) can boost resilience, productivity, and growth. McKinsey & Company The physical environment is the delivery mechanism for that investment.
And yet, the built environment sector was not especially visible in these conversations.
The decision point: If you are making capital allocation decisions around real estate, the calculus has changed. Healthy, high-performing buildings are becoming a condition of market relevance, not a branding exercise. And if you work in certification, advisory, or standards development, there is a clear opportunity—and responsibility—to show up more directly in broader business conversations about human capital and productivity.
Now what? If you are making capital allocation decisions around real estate, the calculus has changed. Healthy, high-performing buildings are becoming a condition of market relevance, not a branding exercise. And if you work in certification, advisory, or standards development, there is a clear opportunity (and responsibility) to show up more directly in broader business conversations about human capital and productivity.
Product: The S in ESG Finally Gets Sharper Attention
In 2026, sustainability will be tested as a true engine of competitiveness, embedded in core business models, investment priorities, and innovation roadmaps, rather than treated as a parallel ESG function.
Regulatory pressure now has teeth. On 1 January 2026, the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism moves from reporting to real financial impact: importers will be required to purchase and surrender CBAM certificates reflecting the embedded carbon in covered goods. Extended Producer Responsibility continues to expand, shifting costs and responsibility for managing products at the end of their life cycle away from municipalities to businesses across product categories from electronics to textiles.
But the most relevant signal wasn't regulatory. It was strategic.
The backlash against ESG is not a retreat from sustainability ambitions. It is a reset toward strategic materiality: focusing on the sustainability topics that really matter for business value creation. The era of reporting everything is giving way to sharper focus on what actually drives decisions, risk, and value creation.
An HPE executive put it bluntly: when it comes to ESG, Environment and Governance issues are relatively easy to define in comparison to the Social dimension. And that difficulty is precisely why it is now under scrutiny.
Now what? If your sustainability reporting is comprehensive but not decision-useful, you are exposed. Organizations that navigate this shift well will be able to clearly connect social performance to business outcomes, rather than relying on volume of disclosure as a proxy for impact.
Partners: Supply Chain Due Diligence Is Now Operational
Supply chain ethics moved decisively from policy aspiration to operational reality at Davos.
Three pressures are converging. As Fortune noted: industry analysts point to geopolitical intervention, regulatory complexity—including cross-jurisdictional human rights and due diligence regimes—and climate-driven shocks. The result is a dense and unforgiving compliance landscape.
The EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive now sits within an increasingly complex puzzle. The EU's Deforestation Regulation and Forced Labour Regulation are also in play, whilst jurisdictions worldwide, from France and Germany to Canada, Australia and the US, have their own supply chain due diligence or reporting requirements. In December 2025, the UK's Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner published a report with sweeping recommendations including proposals for mandatory human rights due diligence, import bans on goods linked to forced labour, and reforms to the Modern Slavery Act.
For the built environment, this is not abstract. Building materials sit within complex, multi-tiered global supply chains. The direction of travel is clear: ethical sourcing and labor rights are becoming baseline expectations, not differentiators.
Supply-chain resilience is elevating from a defensive measure to a core growth lever. Resilience now underpins agility, market access, and investor confidence in a world where disruption is structural, not cyclical.
Now what? If your procurement processes do not include robust due diligence on labor practices and human rights, you are already exposed. The window for treating this as aspirational has closed.
Philanthropy: From Giving to Systems Investment
Philanthropy conversations at Davos reflected a broader shift toward systemic intervention.
A McKinsey white paper explored the role corporate philanthropy can play in accelerating climate and nature transitions, acting as a bridge between public and private sectors and leveraging the knowledge of corporate affiliates towards positive societal impact. The emphasis was on catalytic capital, not charitable spend.
The Standard Chartered Foundation convened discussions on economic participation, exploring pathways to facilitate skills development, jobs, and inclusion, and the partnerships needed to unlock them. The framing moved beyond programs toward new innovative financial models that can address challenges like poor job availability and skills gaps, strengthening the foundations of markets and reducing instability.
Collective impact models featured prominently. Collective giving challenges traditional hierarchies by dispersing decision-making power. It builds social capital as people deliberate and act together.
Now what? If your community investment strategy remains siloed from your core business, you are leaving value on the table. The organizations gaining traction are those aligning philanthropy with workforce development, supply chain capacity, and long-term market building.
Patterns That Stand Out
Several patterns cut across all five pillars:
Measurement is being recalibrated. Bloated disclosures and immaterial metrics diluted the business relevance of sustainability reporting in 2025. Executives and investors were left with too much data and too little insight. What's now being rewarded is impact that informs decisions, not activity that fills pages.
Human-centricity is moving to the boardroom. Leaders at Davos indicated the most successful organizations would adopt a "human in the lead" mindset, where AI augments employee capability instead of replacing it. Workplace wellbeing is no longer an amenity discussion. It is an operating model and governance discussion.
Resilience has eclipsed efficiency. Disruption is structural, not cyclical. The implications for how buildings are designed, certified, financed, and operated follow directly.
The signal from Davos is clear. Social sustainability in the built environment is moving from optional enhancement to business necessity.
As the 'brown discount' begins to bite, the built environment will likely split: not between 'green' and 'non-green,' but between assets that support human life and those that simply occupy space.
The Conversation Continues...
This post is part of our ongoing exploration into how global market signals—from the rise of the 'brown discount' to the hardening of supply chain regulations—are transforming social sustainability from an optional amenity into a core governance issue. As problem-solvers, we believe the best insights emerge when diverse perspectives meet. Have you encountered similar challenges or discovered different approaches? Share your story.
Connect with us as we continue to prototype, test, and learn:
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join us on Linkedin
Explore our resources
We acknowledge that social sustainability is always a work in progress. These insights represent our current understanding, shaped by our partners, communities, and continuous learning.